MU Soapbox

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Muxify
    • Mustard
    1. Home
    2. Lotherio
    3. Best
    • Profile
    • Following 6
    • Followers 5
    • Topics 41
    • Posts 1243
    • Best 575
    • Controversial 3
    • Groups 1

    Best posts made by Lotherio

    • RE: Good TV

      @Auspice said in Good TV:

      He's a guy who was bullied for how he looked, so instead of some hackneyed LET'S GIVE YOU A MAKEOVER STORY TEEHEE (female chars get subjected to this far, far too often), they had him own the shit out of it.

      Aisha is here, not doing a makeover, torn between being who she was and sporting some new change where she own's it. Tory and Sam's indifferent struggles might give her more independence we saw from her throughout, but Tory to follow after Sam left had her puppy-dogging a friend. She's ready to be way more independent strong.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Lotherio
      Lotherio
    • RE: OC Superhero Discussion

      I'm in the boat that it sounds like Masks/PbtA might be the route to go. It seems more conducive to a MU environment, with things like goal setting and rp? Secondary to this D6 or a similar lite universal system that's easier for folks to understand. I know the @ZombieGenesis is looking at M&M already and I'm stating it after the fact but just got back on line after this weekend.

      I like the legacy idea, it gives folks by in with the ability to run plot/PrP and develop group stories; I'm not a fan of 'you must get staff approval for every PrP'. I don't like the Homage idea of shaving off serial numbers. Most folks going OC have something different envisioned already and/or don't know enough FC folks to know its close to one of them. If someone comes in wanting super set (strength/dex/super senses/durability etc), they don't want to go through the 'ok, so you want to be like superman' 'no' 'oh, then Luke Cage' 'no not like him either' 'Oh maybe Colossus' .... In the end they may build something similar to one but with their own take on it and its like being hit with a hammer when someone keeps making references to FC while they're trying to formulate their OC idea.

      Lastly and, as has been pointed out, hopefully you all figure out a team of folks to help out with this idea. Folks handling various spheres or something would be good. Sorry for slow response, bad service/no internet most of the weekend.

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      Lotherio
      Lotherio
    • RE: Good TV

      @Auspice said in Good TV:

      I just need more from Aisha. I figure they'll likely give her more of her own story in season 3

      @GreenFlashlight said in Good TV:

      I really like Aisha's character and I want to see more of her. I have this cynical suspicion the show isn't focusing on her as much because she's overweight and god knows we can't have that when there are girls with tight butts and deep cleavage to focus on. I probably should have included that in my grievances in my original review.

      Both of these, I want to see more of her too. Nopefully season three gives her a little more sparkle to get away from the other girls and be on her own. I hope its not that the other girls are tight butted or whatever, I'd rather get away from that, but if they're using those to sell it (teenage sex) a little, meh. I'm in her corner, she's my fav.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Lotherio
      Lotherio
    • RE: MUs That We Would Love To Make (But Won't)

      @zombiegenesis said in MUs That We Would Love To Make (But Won't):

      Masters of the Universe. Even with the recent resurgence I just don't think this theme would work well. Even if you expanded it to include other, similar, properties such as Thundercats. I think you'd have a hard time getting people to "play it straight" and take the theme seriously.

      Or a Thundarr the Barbarian-esque sort of deal. Its years beyond the apocalypse, the world is now future-primitive with sorcery of some sort. Science guys with psionics control cities and computer and high tech stuff, people still have machines but live by simple farming, some folks learned magic (or its derived from tech or something).

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      Lotherio
      Lotherio
    • RE: Good or New Movies Review

      @Arkandel said in Good or New Movies Review:

      Basically it'd have been set in an Earth-in-the-1930s-like gangster setting, presumably while trying to not break the Prime Directive. I dunno, that's certainly different!

      Its called The City on the Edge of Forever, where McCoy travels to 1930s NYC and saves someone who was supposed to die, they start a movement that delays the US entry into WWII, and the Nazi's develop nukes 1st and win. Like that 1930s try not to break the Prime Directive, or different?

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Lotherio
      Lotherio
    • RE: MUs That We Would Love To Make (But Won't)

      @de-villefort Now that you point it out, Robin Hood story is pretty similar to a lot of Western Movies, but instead of crusades, they're coming back from Civil War and such. Disney Robin Hood would be interesting.

      I was pondering a place once using Zootopia, big city big dreams, big crimes. It had plenty of corruption. Heck the main character works with a mob boss for the purpose of solving the missing predators case. Combat was more focused on chasing (foot and vehicular). Cops/robbers type stuff, it's prevalent in some of the conceptual work - chase signs in rain forest district, an old swampy place Nick was gonna use for contacts that was like an illegal casino. I was persuaded not to pursue this one.

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      Lotherio
      Lotherio
    • RE: Good TV

      @Coin said in Good TV:

      If it worked for Robert Downey Jr. for ten fucking years...

      Didn't Jackson enjoy playing with these old tricks to mix up size on all the lotr films, as I recall?

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Lotherio
      Lotherio
    • RE: MUs That We Would Love To Make (But Won't)

      @ominous said in MUs That We Would Love To Make (But Won't):

      @ganymede

      leads to feudalism, planetary destruction, and massive family battles fought by mercenaries.

      Or Traveller.

      Or something with the Dune IP.

      Or 12th to 15th Century northern Italy.

      Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to ...

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      Lotherio
      Lotherio
    • RE: Random funny

      @Arkandel said in Random funny:

      Do you want Planet of the Crabs? Because that's how you get Planet of the Crabs.

      You sure we don't already have this, out at the truck stop restroom near the turn pike on I-80?

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Lotherio
      Lotherio
    • RE: MUs That We Would Love To Make (But Won't)

      @faraday said in MUs That We Would Love To Make (But Won't):

      I think it would be hard to sustain a MU like that.

      I don't know how many times Seattle can suffer large scale catastrophes. Ships crash into the docks, the medical people get into a car wreck on the way there, the helicopter airlifting is caught in some freak thermal draft. I don't know why Seattle is so unlucky, but there's always another season of Grey's Anatomy.

      Someone could probably make a large plot/small plot generator taking all the seasons of Grey's Anatomy and the seasons of Chicago Fire and Chicago PD. Roll for large plot: 26 - two commercial planes collide at the airport, each player rolls small plot: 55 - you get a flat tire someone sees you in your uniform while changing out the spare and they are pregnant but can't get through cause roads closed for large plot.

      For some people, this RP would be boring however.

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      Lotherio
      Lotherio
    • RE: Good TV

      Without TOS there would be no Star Trek.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Lotherio
      Lotherio
    • RE: MUs That We Would Love To Make (But Won't)

      @ganymede said in MUs That We Would Love To Make (But Won't):

      People: OMG, is being a lawyer like it is on Law and Order?

      objection

      Lawyering looks awesome!

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      Lotherio
      Lotherio
    • RE: Good TV

      @coin said in Good TV:

      @greenflashlight said in Good TV:

      @coin said in Good TV:

      @greenflashlight said in Good TV:

      @lotherio said in Good TV:

      Without TOS there would be no Star Trek.

      But without Dracula, there would be no Twilight. Just saying.

      Dracula's more TNG to The Vampyre's TOS. Also I don't get the point. Are you insinuating that the new Star Trek properties are to TOS what Twilight is to Dracula?

      I'm saying that if a sequel's quality reflect on the original material, then that goes both ways. If you prefer, pretend I said that without TOS, there would be no Voyager, or no Star Trek V.

      Certainly more consistent to the comparisons being drawn, at least.

      Yeah I don't know where folks were going with comparisons. I was implying TOS is my favorite despite being very dated to the time it was created. It brought science/ fiction forward to pave the easy so to speak. It's better than the other campy, very dated series that did the same. I'll take Shatners Kirk over Wests Batman. All the other Trk series are good, but they had time to gather more sources and influence to their writing and filmography. TOS is still my fav.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Lotherio
      Lotherio
    • RE: MUs That We Would Love To Make (But Won't)

      @misadventure Oh most places can have secrets but the absolute that its this secret that is consumes most of one's life that they must never share is pretty specific to like WoD as far as I know. The others depends on the level of politics. If the L&L allows politicking to like better oneself/station and ways to overthrow each other, sure there can be plenty of secrets that are not just who loves who and who dumped who.

      But like I say, I and plenty others have played modern, no fantasy (no magic, no monsters, no nothing beyond what is in reality already) and are okay in social RP. Whether its just to pass time between the next life emergency/fire at the hospital or to plan some save the whale event. Its not for everyone, but some people like it.

      This absolute that its mostly 'boring' or that everyone needs a super massive secret to be exciting is like hyperbole from some absolute stance. Just as mentioned, history and present says otherwise, folks will play 'mundane' games and do social RP. Not to bring it into the conversation or draw comments about it, but Crystal Springs is pretty much just modern, it has 30 players on most nights with 40 scenes going on. This seems far from boring.

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      Lotherio
      Lotherio
    • RE: Good TV

      @derp said in Good TV:

      @lotherio said in Good TV:

      @coin said in Good TV:

      @greenflashlight said in Good TV:

      @coin said in Good TV:

      @greenflashlight said in Good TV:

      @lotherio said in Good TV:

      Without TOS there would be no Star Trek.

      But without Dracula, there would be no Twilight. Just saying.

      Dracula's more TNG to The Vampyre's TOS. Also I don't get the point. Are you insinuating that the new Star Trek properties are to TOS what Twilight is to Dracula?

      I'm saying that if a sequel's quality reflect on the original material, then that goes both ways. If you prefer, pretend I said that without TOS, there would be no Voyager, or no Star Trek V.

      Certainly more consistent to the comparisons being drawn, at least.

      Yeah I don't know where folks were going with comparisons. I was implying TOS is my favorite despite being very dated to the time it was created. It brought science/ fiction forward to pave the easy so to speak. It's better than the other campy, very dated series that did the same. I'll take Shatners Kirk over Wests Batman. All the other Trk series are good, but they had time to gather more sources and influence to their writing and filmography. TOS is still my fav.

      Pike > Kirk. Fite me.

      No debate here. Good to see his story getting more attention even though the replacement was because original original trek didn't take off. Hunter is up there too. The interesting thing is they made the new actor Kirk instead of how other shows just brought in new actor for fame old bit like Bewitchef and the Darrens.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Lotherio
      Lotherio
    • RE: MUs That We Would Love To Make (But Won't)

      @de-villefort said in MUs That We Would Love To Make (But Won't):

      All these setting create systemic isolation. That's what I'm saying. Game designers and people who run games need to be aware of this if they want to address it.

      I agree and this is fair, its not most MU's in my experience. I don't see it in most games I play on and games I run do not enforce some masque or other reason for players not to social RP together. The more they know of each other the easier it is to plot some PrP or get in Staff Plot as a group versus random strangers.

      As a player I have been to WoD places that were huge on mask, I know what you're referring too its just not that prevalent as seems implied. I recall one time on one place I had a shifter who met some offshoot changeling being who presented as a tree or some nature thing and talked about Gaia or something and my PC admitted enough to let them know he wasn't wholly human and the next day staff NPC/alt/whatever reamed him a new one. I was still able to make and find meaningful social RP at that place.

      I don't think its all games though.

      As important to staff and game design though, I include at least half responsibility on players to make the effort. Taking for granted the fewer places where someone might think you need to die for breaking the silence/revealing the secret (or more so in the 90s maybe), in the end folks can still find ways to plot and play together. Literally on that same place, when that same char would meet people, I'd ooc talk first about what was okay to 'let out' or find ways to 'reveal' things such that they could work together more (or in opposition if they wanted).

      Or like supers, like 2-3 scenes or 1/3 of the comics I read is combat (give or take), the rest is social. If Bruce doesn't let Clark Kent to the gala, that's on the players. Clark could be journaling the event while secretly maybe they both expect some Luthor attack on them or something. They can find a reason.

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      Lotherio
      Lotherio
    • RE: Olympic Torches

      @ominous said in Olympic Torches:

      I'm watching it now, and I can think of is sympathy for Japan. All those expensive, empty stadiums and facilities. Countries never make back what they spend for these events, but that's definitely true for Japan in this case.

      Yeah, that's a hard one. And they had a doctor and nurse as part of the torch teams in the stadium, that really hit home. I'm impressed and then sad yeah. The outdoor events have some people in the stands. Or cycling finish is getting people in seats. Still the indoor ones are empty.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Lotherio
      Lotherio
    • RE: MUs That We Would Love To Make (But Won't)

      @icanbeyourmuse said in MUs That We Would Love To Make (But Won't):

      A more fighty type? As suggested over hear plans of a mugging or potential murder or whatever and go be heroic and try stopping it with your friends. Train with your buddies, discuss the latest combat techniques. (I don't know much about combat stuff so best I can do)

      Not to add more reasons why to go the gala/social event. But this here. Both supers are not familiar though in the comics they end up on the same team. This moment where you're both in your mundane identity and something happens in front of your face - how do you stop it, do you out your secret or do you find another clever way to stop it. Not just the show up later in disguise after overhearing, but literally if you two seem to get along during the social event, move to something happens that tests this secret identity even.

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      Lotherio
      Lotherio
    • RE: Good or New Movies Review

      @ganymede said in Good or New Movies Review:

      @arkandel said in Good or New Movies Review:

      It's not that I just don't know anything about them from the comics (I barely knew who the Guardians of the Galaxy were after all before the first movie came out) but dropping a bunch of characters on us in one movie sounds like it won't work.

      Well, it worked for Shang-Chi, right?

      Or, Guardians of the Galaxy?

      I liked the initial Avengers movies, but I think Guardians brought in more by being unfamiliar to more folks. The humor seemed to work. My worry is, its a much larger cast than five misfits.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Lotherio
      Lotherio
    • RE: MUs That We Would Love To Make (But Won't)

      @groth said in MUs That We Would Love To Make (But Won't):

      It's possible to make these scenes interesting(The article linked in this thread is great) but it takes more effort since you have to break the pattern and introduce something the rest want to interact with

      This isn't limited to absolute social where nothing is advanced RP (character/story/whatever).

      If I'm getting nothing interesting in combat, I'm likely not to combat again with that person. If the code indicates John hit the monster with his sword and his pose is, 'John swings his sword at the goblin it bites and blood flows, he moves to swing again', well that's as exciting as the social entrance of, 'John enters the room orders a drink doesn't look at anyone and sits in the corner alone'.

      RP takes effort, regardless if its all combat or all social or everything in between. Want of one doesn't invalidate the other or others interest in doing just that.

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      Lotherio
      Lotherio
    • 1
    • 2
    • 23
    • 24
    • 25
    • 26
    • 27
    • 28
    • 29
    • 25 / 29