MU Soapbox

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Muxify
    • Mustard
    1. Home
    2. HelloRaptor
    3. Posts
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 8
    • Topics 8
    • Posts 676
    • Best 242
    • Controversial 5
    • Groups 0

    Posts made by HelloRaptor

    • RE: The State of the Chronicles of Darkness

      @Trundlebot

      I mean, you can say that people will be reasonable unless they're assholes, but I've gotten a lot of shit on a lot of games for deviating from what people expected certain splats to act like before.

      I didn't go back and read my whole stupid post, but I'm pretty sure the only problem with assholes I mentioned was if your ST was an asshole, in terms of setting up your appearance by Kith. If your start point at a game is somebody in charge being an asshole to you, you should probably play somewhere else.

      If you're talking about people being assholes to you because you deviate from what they expect to be the norm for your type, get over it or get out, because that's going to happen anyway for one reason or another.

      even if they add a small text disclaimer later.

      Except it's not a small text disclaimer, nor is it 'later', it prefaces the entire section on Kith examples by saying "THESE ARE JUST A FEW EXAMPLES.", and don't even have examples for each Kith with each Seeming.

      But the people who pitch a fit about this and scream "superfriends!" and want to keep spheres separate aren't just being assholes, they're following the precedent laid down in the books.

      No, they really aren't. Not in nWoD anyway. Right down to the core books there's flat out examples of and indications of reasons why people can and do work together/exchange information and favors/etc.

      You're right though, people are assholes about it. But I haven't once even considered not playing that way just because people might be dicks, so I'm hardly going to encourage that in others.

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      HelloRaptor
      HelloRaptor
    • RE: The State of the Chronicles of Darkness

      @Mnemosyne

      You're addressing a different person's post! I only made the ones about the Fairest.

      Yeah, I do that a lot. Sorry. >_>

      I like giving them some more agency. I don't like that -- and this is based on the Kith document, where Wizened are always patchwork people and Beasts are always animalistic and Fairest are always beautiful and Ogres are always big hulking brutes, et cetera, no matter which Kith you choose -- these very specific types of agency now define how your character looks.

      This time I got the right quote with the right person. I think. Right? It was you? Pretty sure.

      You're wrong, though. Or rather, you're reading specific examples in the Kith document too much as if they're the only way to fly. The kith document even calls out the fact that the examples are just a tiny sampling, and any given Keeper will have its own twist on things. The examples used were the most stereotypical for the Kith/Seeming combination, not meant to imply the limitations you're reading into it.

      The physical description of each Kith by seeming is 100% in alignment with 1E Seemings.

      So maybe they're lazy, and only working with stereotypes they already had on the shelf?

      The only actual limitations of appearance are specifically noted as such: All palewraiths have transparent skin, all razorhands always have some sort of natural or artificial weapon attached to their hands, etc. But even then they flat out say that:

      Also, players are free to change the listed appearance of a kith belonging to a particular seeming as long as their Storytellers agree that the new description fits with the meaning and feel of the kith and the changeling's seeming.

      So unless your Storyteller is actually a full on asshole, your particular manifestation of a given Kith can look like whatever the fuck you want within the scope of your Seeming and your ST's discretion regarding your Keeper. Obviously if your Keeper was some super high tech space alien fucker you probably don't look like a fantasy troll, but beyond that even the Kith document makes it clear: Here are a bunch of suggestions, but make up your own wherever you want.

      As to Seeming appearance, from the Seeming documents:

      Ogres may seem to take up more space than they should, but they are not always big, nor hulking, nor brutes. The appearance section even mentions that an ogre may be small, or conduct their violence through verbal or emotionally and without any physical thuggery involved. In fact, outside of impressions other Changelings get of the space you occupy, the only physical characteristic specific to ogre is that they don't show off any skin as they're covered in 'something harder'. You could be a slender as fuck runway model to regular humans, gorgeous as anybody could be, and to Changelings be covered head to toe in diamonds and platinum or whatever. Sparkle on, you emotionally vicious mean girl.

      The Fairest 'appearance' writeup is almost laughably vague, with the only specific indication of actual appearance being that there'll be some symbol of leadership to Changeling eyes, and some kind of glow, sparkle, reflection, or light about them. There is actually nothing at all in the Fairest description about even being physically attractive, which is kind of lulz.

      Darklings also mention virtually nothng about your actual appearance under appearance. Posture, disguises and masks worn, sure. But nothing about what you actually look like (or can't look like).

      @Sammi

      An Ogre could regret replacing his heart, but unless he has a death wish, he would do it again if he were in the same situation.

      And... so? You're unlikely to ever be in the same situation. Changelings taken by a Keeper aren't just fighting for survival, they're fighting to not be completely obliterated and overwritten by something Other.

      Your Seeming represents who you were in a transformative, supernaturally charged moment that represents the most extreme of extremes. In most cases that is likely very reflective of who a person is, but people are not wholly defined by a single moment or even a single choice in their lives. They are not represented by a story, and that story is who they are and who they must be, because they are Changelings and not truly Fae.

      There's a lot of reading of the Seemings like they must absolutely represent True And Immutable Facts about how your character will act or think or be, but there are virtually no True And Immutable Facts about how people will act, or think, or be.

      Perhaps that's some emphasis that needs to be placed there in Changeling, because the alternative that seems to be how people are reading it makes no goddamn sense to me. Your Seeming is what it is because at a time when the very essence of your existence was being made malleable and shaped to the liking of something Other, you (the character, obviously) made a choice, took agency and acted. That choice, those actions, acted as a supernatural mold to finish you off and your Seeming is the shape you hold because of that choice.

      Maybe, back in the world of humans, where the very fundamental essence of your being isn't in immediate danger with every breath you take, that mold doesn't fit very well. Maybe it doesn't fit because absent that extreme of extremes that's not how you believe you will or would act. Maybe it doesn't fit because it's not what you want for yourself, and you try and deny it.

      Is that going to be the case for the vast majority of Changelings? Probably not. But to say that you can't be at odds/in conflict with the shape of the supernatural mold you cooked yourself into when the alternative was worse than death if that's the kind of character you want to play, seems utterly unreasonable to me.

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      HelloRaptor
      HelloRaptor
    • RE: E3 2015

      You people and your Xbones. Filthy savages.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      HelloRaptor
      HelloRaptor
    • RE: The State of the Chronicles of Darkness

      @Sammi

      A better way to think of it: kith is the fabric, and the changeling's choice of Seeming cuts a pattern out of it. What you are in Arcadia is the raw material, and you forge yourself via your choice to escape (this falls in to one of six archetypes).

      Quoting that for explanation elsewhere, because that's a good way of putting it.

      So changelings who don't fit their Seeming are out.

      I don't know that this is necessarily the case, really. I've yet to see anything that doesn't suggest you can't be a poor fit for your Seeming, only that your choices during your escape define your Seeming. Is there anything to restrict an Ogre from regretting replacing his heart with stone, or a Fairest who stood up to lead during her escape just wishing she wasn't giving off Champion vibes? As far as I can tell, aside from the indication that the average Lost, even most of them, are a pretty good match for their Seeming, there's nothing really restricting you from playing it as if it's a poor fit.

      You'll have a tough time of it, sure, but I'd assume that's sort of the point of deciding to play a character whose nature (or what they want their nature to be) runs counter to what they're supernaturally supposed to be.

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      HelloRaptor
      HelloRaptor
    • RE: The State of the Chronicles of Darkness

      @Mnemosyne

      I'm sure there's no shortage of possibilities! But there are still fewer than there were in 1E, and to me that's a strange revision to make.

      Absent the Dual Kith merit or super high power stat, I found the exact opposite to be true about 1e.

      Lots of communal creatures- wolves, rabbits, ants, whatever- might love the idea of finding people they can trust and pledge with, except that mechanically they're not allowed to do that.

      What? From the Beast reference document: "A Beast can, of her own free will, enter into a Contract or Pledge or other more intimate acts of binding, but it chuffs her more than the average Lost."

      There is mechanically nothing preventing a Beast from trusting or Pleding with folks. They don't even suffer a penalty. At worst there's flavor text suggesting you're 'more chuffed than the average Lost', which is meaningless since there's no set value for how 'chuffed' the 'average Lost' is.

      The only mechanical imposition is "Forced confinement, especially the physical kind, is too much for her. Escaping bonds requires three Glamour instead of one. Once per story, if a Beast is confined or imprisoned, she suffers a Clarity breaking point.", which is not at all what you described.

      While I find your objection to the Fairest changes much more reasonable, and understandable, than most others (in that they are quite different than 1e Fairest, not that they're now Sidhe, which is not at all the case), your Beast example doesn't really make any sense.

      Maybe I want to play, for instance, a spider ling as a genteel, refined housekeeper inviting people into her parlor, a woman who's nothing but civilized and refined, except that mechanically is a punished concept basically.

      How is this punished? Are you somehow equating having a house with confinement? One of the example blurbs is a stock broker, isn't it?

      The character creation specifically calls out that not all beasts are pulse pounding brutes, and that more cerebral beasts exist as well. I see nothing to suggest that your spider example doesn't work. It's just not called out specifically as a concept, but jesus, there was so much ground to cover that not EVERY kind of Beast was going to get its honorable mention in a first draft. If your beast's particular passion involves the trappings of civility and social refinement than that is what they'll focus on to exactly the extreme the Beast writeup suggests.

      It's like you're deliberately choosing to interpret this shit in the worst possible way so that it affirms your fears. "It doesn't say I can, so I can't." is a terrible way to read the basics of a character archetype.

      Pooka were usually the most popular splat on oWoD Changeling games, due to all the variety of animals you could build. Except... whatever animal type you made, you were pretty strong corralled by the mechanics and flavor to make a silly shit-stirring trickster type.

      To be fair, they fixed that officially when the Pooka book came out and what constituted 'lying'. It'd been unofficially clarified almost after the Changeling book come out, but the fact was that the majority of folkes seemed to want to play a silly, shit-stirring trickster.

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      HelloRaptor
      HelloRaptor
    • RE: The State of the Chronicles of Darkness

      @tragedyjones said:

      What are the thoughts on Mage 2nd, also? I never really played Mage on a MU so I dunno more than just the basics of 1st ed.

      It looks like it's handling a lot of things better than it did. The whole 'Reach' mechanic seems like a way better way to handle a lot of the wiggly bits of mechanics than the way it is in 1.0, and a number of spells becoming innate abilities gained at a given Arcanum level (with their own discrete rules instead of using the general spellcasting rules), is awesome.

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      HelloRaptor
      HelloRaptor
    • RE: The State of the Chronicles of Darkness

      @Surreality & @Thenomain

      So no expendable henchmen as a Fairest. I agree that that's a bit odd, especially since the curse is about regretting failure and sometimes plans might succeed because underlings get hurt.

      You can absolutely have expendable henchmen as a Fairest. Fairest have problems with unintended harm. You can still be a fucking tyrant as a Fairest, you can still throw underlings at a problem with the expectation that they'll suffer even grievous harm in the process, if it's necessary to succeed. You can't just not give a shit who gets hurt, ever, no but there's nothing that says your breaking point is some kind of angst over 'precious little ducklings' getting hurt. You could just be the ultimate control freak and somebody getting hurt unexpectedly represents a factor you didn't have proper control over, thus threatening your Clarity. Clarity you probably recover pretty quickly given how a character like that would play into their Blessing.

      @Sammi

      If you're Major Winters, you know that your men are in a dangerous situation. You put them there, and you're responsible for getting them out safely. Any failure reflects badly on you. If you're Henry V, it's expected that many of your soldiers will die, but every one of them will weigh on your conscience. You are the fearless leader and you carry the burden of the wellbeing of those who follow you because they willingly put their lives in your hands. This is not a requirement for coddling, this is ethical leadership in a combat situation.

      Or that, yeah.

      I've been at this with Thenomain in the past, and my conclusion is still that the problem has far less to do with there actually being a problem and far more to do with him and others just refusing to read things in any way that doesn't support their gloom and doom.

      C:tL 2.0 so far looks pretty much hands down better than 1.0, and unlinking the Kith and Seeming has so far been pretty awesome. I've been tossing ideas for both as they've been getting posted, and so far I haven't had any trouble coming up with pretty much any concept I might like to play. The fact that people (not just Thenomain) keep saying "You totally couldn't play a X as Y." and I can immediately think of multiple examples of exactly that sort of character fitting exactly so, suggests to me that the problem isn't in the (admittedly not very well edited and occasionally lacking clarity, if you'll excuse the pun) writeups but in the people reading them having come to a decision on what it means and refusing to consider an alternative that doesn't depress them.

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      HelloRaptor
      HelloRaptor
    • RE: E3 2015

      @Ganymede

      as opposed to fucking FF7

      link text

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      HelloRaptor
      HelloRaptor
    • RE: The State of the Chronicles of Darkness

      @Pyrephox said:

      @Thenomain said:

      Semantics. Your Seeming is basically who you are now.

      If your definition of "semantics" is "entirely incorrect", then yes, I suppose so. And your Seeming is no more "basically who you are now" than it was in 1.0. In some ways less, because before seeming and kith were linked and formed the thrust of a whole identity for a Lost. Now, there's more nuance - your kith is what your Keeper forced upon you, your Seeming is what you took for yourself. A part of your identity, sure, but maybe not a part you ever wanted, or a part that defines you entirely. A Fairest might have had a moment of heroism that left its mark on her, but she could totally be a coward in most circumstances who resents the way that the ONE TIME she managed to step up and take the reins is now stamped on her head for all eternity, giving all these people expectations that she knows she can never fill.

      This, all of it, forever.

      @Sammi

      Not all changelings who are bullies escaped Arcadia by replacing their hearts with stone and beating their way out. All changelings who escaped by replacing their hearts with stone, etc. are Ogres.

      Also that, yes.

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      HelloRaptor
      HelloRaptor
    • RE: RL peeves! >< @$!#

      @Sponge said:

      If you find yourself saying "I don't mean to X but..." stop right there. The most effective way to not do that thing is to just not do it. If you have to, hold your lips closed because any sentence that starts with that format is not going anywhere anyone wants to go.

      This peeve comes up a lot. I have to wonder if none of the people who bitch about it have ever said anything they realized might be taken out of context or otherwise in completely the wrong way due to who they're speaking to.

      I realize it's often enough used as if it gives a get out of jail free card (it doesn't) when prefacing something that is absolutely racist/sexist/assholeish/whatever, but c'mon, really? You've never said, "I'm not trying to be mean, but that outfit is a terrible choice for what we're doing." and legitimately were not trying to be mean, but knew you're talking to your histrionic sibling/friend/whatever who takes any such observation as if it's the end of the world?

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      HelloRaptor
      HelloRaptor
    • RE: The State of the Chronicles of Darkness

      @Derp said:

      @Sammi

      See... that reads an awful lot like it's the source of the ex-boyfriend's pain that would cause the break. Perhas that's where I'm getting disconnected.

      What Sammi said. The above is def not the case. It's being forced to confront their own pain and its sources, not other people's.

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      HelloRaptor
      HelloRaptor
    • RE: The State of the Chronicles of Darkness

      There's a bunch of basic spelling/syntax/etc errors through the whole thing. It's like a first scribble of a draft, really.

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      HelloRaptor
      HelloRaptor
    • RE: E3 2015

      Horizon Zero Dawn aaaagh whaaaaat. So awesome.

      It's probably too much to hope it'll be 60fps. 😕

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      HelloRaptor
      HelloRaptor
    • RE: The State of the Chronicles of Darkness

      @Thenomain

      Fortunately they're optional (note: if they're not, that sucks), because I can't think of an existing character concept in my head that would fit any to date.

      ...what are optional? The Seemings? o.O

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      HelloRaptor
      HelloRaptor
    • RE: The State of the Chronicles of Darkness

      @tragedyjones said:

      I don't know Lost very well, but I love me some Ogres. They have layers.
      CHANGELING THE LOST SECOND EDITION: OGRES
      http://theonyxpath.com/changeling-the-lost-second-edition-ogres/

      "Tattoos are a popular option."

      Cue all the whiners who bitch about people having tattoos signifying their supernatural allegiances, despite every wod book since the dawn of time saying characters do so, depicting characters doing so, etc.

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      HelloRaptor
      HelloRaptor
    • RE: Eldritch - A World of Darkness MUX

      @Thenomain said:

      @HelloRaptor said:

      Somehow I feel like switching antivirus is less onerous a task than switching operating systems.

      Then you haven't really dealt with McAfee.

      (I have no idea if you have or haven't, but it was funny.)

      I used to. Now I use third party uninstallers to handle it, because again, fuck McAfee.

      posted in Adver-tis-ments
      HelloRaptor
      HelloRaptor
    • RE: Eldritch - A World of Darkness MUX

      @Arkandel said:

      @HelloRaptor said:

      @Tennyson said:

      @Tennyson said:

      Is it potentially a reserved port on Windows?

      Sigh. I just checked my antivirus and yep. McAfee was saying NO YOU CAN'T DO THAT!

      So I've been pounding on the knowledge base. They suggest that you add telnet/simplemu to the exceptions under the mail spam prevention.. only that didn't work. So if anyone has suggestions, I'm open to answers!

      Right, so here's the fix. Go to the virus scan console. Select access protection. Select anti-virus standard protection. Select prevent irc communication. Add Simplemu.exe (or whatever program) to the exceptions list. Apply. Voila! Connecting.

      Alternately, stop using McAfee, because goddamn.

      Alternately, stop using Windows, because goddamn. 🙂

      Somehow I feel like switching antivirus is less onerous a task than switching operating systems. 😑

      posted in Adver-tis-ments
      HelloRaptor
      HelloRaptor
    • RE: E3 2015

      @Bobotron
      Did not see this here, so posted about it in RL Things I Love, which... I guess is sort of on topic.

      But yes. Yessssssssssssssssss.Eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!

      I am giddy like a schoolgirl. I'd been resisting a new gen console despite Kingdom Hearts 3 and FFXV tempting me, but this kind of cinches it. Now I just need to figure out how to convince my wife of the truefax that I might die of sorrow without this.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      HelloRaptor
      HelloRaptor
    • RE: RL things I love

      Final Fantasy VII HD Remake for PS4 confirmed.

      link text

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      HelloRaptor
      HelloRaptor
    • RE: RL peeves! >< @$!#

      @Olsson said:

      So apparantly the guy who does a lot of economy stuff for my family? In jail, for beating a couple uncounciouss and burning a house down with them inside.

      That's a thing now apparantly.

      It's always been a thing, we just usually don't get caugh... I mean, yeah, what? That's crazy. Who does that?

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      HelloRaptor
      HelloRaptor
    • 1
    • 2
    • 16
    • 17
    • 18
    • 19
    • 20
    • 33
    • 34
    • 18 / 34