@faraday said in A Lack of Imagination:
Also interesting, since a couple folks have mentioned it on this thread:
a substantial proportion of those contacting us also report problems with face recognition or ‘prosopagnosia’.
This is also interesting to me because I feel like I'm very bad at recognizing faces -- I don't always realise X is the actor who played Y as well, for example, and I'm always worried I won't recognize a friend or relative I haven't seen in a while when I go to see them again. But the thing with the latter is I virtually always do. I took an online test recently (part of a study, rather than a 'for fun' type) and my result came back as solidly average. So I think I'm actually not notably bad at facial recognition, but because I store them somewhere I can't 'see', I feel a lot worse at it than I really am. I don't have the precision of description for faces to feel confident in connecting what I have with what's really there when I see it.
I'm actually not terrible at remembering hair colours of characters, heights, things like that, but it's a sort of fact file rather than an image. If a mind laid things out like your sort of standard wiki char page, my brain skips the picture and just goes with the table with the 'hair', 'eyes', etc. in it.
I think that, as well as with the continuum people seem to have from 'nothing, just blackness' to 'vivid, detailed, photorealistic' for mental images, there's also differences in the ways people toward the 'blackness' end up processing/storing/accessing data that we'd think of as visual. It's hard to talk about to figure out details, though, because there's a point where I always end up coming back to: I don't see anything, but for a number of things, I just know.