Posts made by ZekeTheG33k

Nwod 1.0 current dayish

I think this is probably the best place for this.

What is the general thoughts of allowing every player a PC with 750 xp right out of the gate?

So.. Vampire Academy?

Well there are a couple of ways. Make the Npc static to a room. Thus multiple people could woo it. That means actually taking the time to care.

Nuku wrote a quest scripting code. So it wouldnt be hard to generate a random set of poses as the investment gets higher...

There would be a lot of data entry, but you could encourage players to submit stories for npcs.

This is just off the top of my head.

I mean code wise all you would need would be a static npc obj or attribute. Then make various rolls to interact with it. Limiting it to say 1 roll per day. The more investment you cultivate the more blood or whatever your goal is that you get.. For example...

Hot chick.
+hunt hot chick
+hunt/act seduce --> You gain 0.1 investment

Rinse and repeat.

So down for it... Please say you'll allow Bast.

Excellent. The trap is working. Fresh sacrifices for the hive mind. You are welcome, oh mighty hive mind.

@bobotron PTU has a system built in to give a capture rate. I plan to integrate this with a simple coded combat system. So players will +search in a grid room and be random attacked by a pokemon. Then have battle it.

.... At least I hope so.

@mr-johnson No. The closest we will have are people who have taken to heart an elemental connection, which gives access to a few moves...

I am slowly working on a pokemon game using the ptu system. But it is a bit labor intensive for what I
want on it. So I will let you know more.

Hello, My name is Seamus. I will admit that I was once known as Matrix @ Due Rewards/Guilded Promises. Please don't hate me.

@Thenomain said in Evennia 0.7 is out:

Can you explain the use for Yield? Thanks.

From what I'm gathering it's like @wait .. Which I think it is used to allow time to do a response. Sort of like:
+bbcleargroup 10
"Please retype the command in 10 seconds or the system will cancel it."
etc...

Let Freedom Ring
http://letfreedomring.wikidot.com/

@Thenomain It's not soft code. It's a server side wrapper.

@Thenomain said in Information Storage Question:

@Seamus said in Information Storage Question:

@Thenomain Well if you want to be picky... lol

Look in the mirror, sir. Are we not coders?!

That's it! I quit! You cannot point out flaws in my logic!

@Thenomain Well if you want to be picky... lol

@Thenomain said in Information Storage Question:

I wouldn't mind going to Penn if it didn't have such a suck-ass channel system. Rhost is really the only option for Mux coders to stay Mux coders, since @Ashen-Shugar pretty much dumps kitchen sink ideas from both code-bases.

The latest build has an option USE_MUXCOM which gives you a built in patch to use mux-like user options. Couple that with Volund's Channel Management and it's actually not to bad, until you have to lock it. But I hacked in Channel Lock Objects for them.

@Mercutio said in Information Storage Question:

@Thenomain
Sounds like a good case for using @dolist instead of one giant @pemit.

Or a series of @includes to break that up.

@skew http://rhostmush.com/autohelp/help.html#idle